In the past this name has been erroneously used to refer to Euonymus lucidus D.Don.
The record derives from WCSP (in review)
(data supplied on 2012-03-23)
which reports it as a misapplied name with original publication details: Fl. Ind. 2: 405 1824.
This name was in version 1 of The Plant List, record kew-2803401, and has not been changed.