In the past this name has been erroneously used to refer to Carex foetida All..
The record derives from WCSP
(data supplied on 2012-03-23)
which reports it as a misapplied name (record 224854) with original publication details: Hist. Pl. Dauphiné 2: 196 1787.
This name was in version 1 of The Plant List, record kew-224854, and has not been changed.