In the past this name has been erroneously used to refer to Liparis loeselii (L.) Rich..
The record derives from WCSP
(data supplied on 2012-03-23)
which reports it as a misapplied name (record 141560) with original publication details: Fl. Dan. t. 877 1782.
This name was in version 1 of The Plant List, record kew-141560.